But personally I don't think you should run this. The Burmese coin got through to the finals fair and square and beat the coin that was supposed to be put up against it. Personally I only voted for the 50 sen in the finals because I thought it was mine. If you run this and the coin ends up losing then the owner of the Burma coin would be well within their rights to be feela bit cheated.
It's like in tennis. Nadal usually beats Federer, Djokovic usually beats Nadal and Federer usually beats Djokovic, but whoever gets into the finals are the ones who count. If Federer loses in the semis to Nadal and then Djokovic beats Nadal in the Final Federer doesn't really have a right to claim victory by saying he usually beats Djokovic.
But it was a weird vote though... the fact that this recount was delayed until now is, like what Neil said, a little silly, but if it was done at the time like this, it would make sense.
#2 for this one. #3 isn't that great, it's just a half-dollar sized silver coin, and #1 is a giant peacock; it's cool, but not as well designed as #2.
Kenny
- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.
Although #1 and #2 were tied, I will allow #1 to win because it won before (and I am only human, so my counting may not have been correct, but people seemed to like #1).