Opinion on merging Estonian Banknotes (25kr and 500kr) [resuelto]

According to the new guidelines on banknote types, I'd like to request some merging to be done:

I would merge these 500 krooni notes, as the only difference is the location of the UV fluorescent rectangle, and therefore not visible to the naked eye

P# 83 N#277809

P# 89 N#210051

And also the 25 krooni notes from 2002 and 2007, according to the same booklet also only a change in location of UV rectangle

P# 84 https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note211128.html

P# 87 N#208048

Please chime in if you have any extra information, but according to me the different pick number were not necessary. If no negative reactions by the end of next week, I'll add yearlines for the current owners to be moved to.

With such a small difference between them, merging them would make sense.

I agree on the 25 krooni but I have a question about the 500 krooni. Are the holograms the same? In particular, do the arms change slightly in the same way as they do for the 100 krooni from 1999 and 2007? From the images I can find, I don't think they do change but, as I don't own either, I just wanted to check.

I'm available if you still want to request yearlines before merge :-)

ceh2019

I agree on the 25 krooni but I have a question about the 500 krooni. Are the holograms the same? In particular, do the arms change slightly in the same way as they do for the 100 krooni from 1999 and 2007? From the images I can find, I don't think they do change but, as I don't own either, I just wanted to check.

Finally got to check and indeed the holograms are different for the 500kr. I will try to get pictures and add it to the comments. So no merge needed.

For the 25kr I still cannot find any difference, so I guess we should merge them. I have added the lines for 2002 on this page N#208048  so please move notes on N#211128 there and then remove page (I guess the 2 “undetermined” ones can go to P#84a, they are probably not specimens).

Done :-)

Shouldn't we put the 2 “undetermined” ones in the regular 2002 yearline, as now we know that's the page they came from? Keeps pointless undetermined lines clean ;-)

BramVB

Shouldn't we put the 2 “undetermined” ones in the regular 2002 yearline, as now we know that's the page they came from? Keeps pointless undetermined lines clean ;-)

I cant move undetermined lines sorry

As long as there is more the one year line you will always have a undetermined year line but it is only visible if you add one to your collection or are a referee of that country.