Are we missing a Bosnian currency? [resuelto]

Currently, we have two dinars for Bosnia, the first issued between 1992 and 1994, the second issued between 1994 and 1998. Various sources agree that the first of these was introduced in July 1992 and replaced the Yugoslav 1990 "Convertible" dinar at a rate of 10:1, matching the introduction of the Yugoslav "Reformed" dinar. However, there are six notes generally refered to as "provisional". Two (P#1 and P#2, currently missing from Numista) were overprints on circulating notes (albeit from the first of the two series of the "Convertible" dinar), see here:
http://banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/EUR/BIH/BIH0001.htm
http://banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/EUR/BIH/BIH0002.htm
The other four were the first of the Novčani Bon (P#6 - P#9), which we have but without a currency specified:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note222966.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note222965.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note222963.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note222960.html
Some of these notes have stamps on them from before July 1992.
My question is, were these notes issued at par with the Yugoslav "Convertible" dinar before the reform of July 1992, meaning that there should be a new "First Dinar" for Bosnia from 1992, with the later two becoming the second and third dinars? One possible counter argument is that some P#8 and P#9 are stamped SARAJEVO, 16.6.1993. Either way, these notes need a currency associating with them.

Any update on the need here?

These four notes

N#222966
N#222965
N#222963
N#222960

still have no currency. There seems to have been no interest from others in this issue but perhaps reviving this thread will help.

ceh2019

These four notes

N#222966
N#222965
N#222963
N#222960

still have no currency. There seems to have been no interest from others in this issue but perhaps reviving this thread will help.

Ok. I have no clue about the question you raised, so just lemme know if a new currency is needed according to the specialists ;-)

All the evidence points to these six notes being on a par with the “Convertible” Yugoslav dinar, as I set out earlier. Could we add a “Provisional Dinar (1992)" for these six and see how the other users react? That way, we don't need to rename the two later currencies.

ceh2019

All the evidence points to these six notes being on a par with the “Convertible” Yugoslav dinar, as I set out earlier. Could we add a “Provisional Dinar (1992)" for these six and see how the other users react? That way, we don't need to rename the two later currencies.

Done :-)